Monday, 28 September 2026 IPO data updated 2 hours ago
Live GMP
A-One Steels India ₹405 ▲ +₹54 (13.3%) Moneyview ₹34 ▲ +₹14 (41.2%) Roopa Screen ₹64 ▲ +₹32 (50.0%) Bench Mark Infotech Services ₹110 ▲ +₹16 (14.6%) Acevector ₹32 ▲ +₹2 (6.3%) Orient Cables India ₹272 ▲ +₹85 (31.3%) German Green Steel Power ₹139 ▲ +₹27.5 (19.8%) Runwal Enterprises ₹305 ▲ +₹14.5 (4.8%) Dudani Retail ₹29 ▲ +₹3 (10.3%) Shah Investor's Home ₹167 ▲ +₹9 (5.4%) SRIT India ₹130 ▲ +₹32 (24.6%) Robokidz Eduventures ₹106 ▲ +₹80 (75.5%) FX Multitech ₹116 ▲ +₹6 (5.2%) ArMee Infotech ₹375 ▲ +₹8 (2.1%) Adroit Industries India ₹134 ▲ +₹53 (39.6%) Elevate Campuses ₹362 ▲ +₹4 (1.1%) Swastika Infra ₹185 ▲ +₹6 (3.2%) EverestIMS Technologies ₹85 ▲ +₹13 (15.3%) Vans Electroengineerings ₹118 ▲ +₹28 (23.7%) Green Asia Impex ₹90 GMP — Peshwa Wheat ₹101 GMP — Sai Urja Indo ₹113 GMP — Himalayan Solar ₹103 GMP — Shree TNB Polymers ₹52 GMP —

U.S. Justice Department Releases Partial Epstein Files, Drawing Criticism for Heavy Redactions and Missed Deadline

U.S. Justice Department Releases Partial Epstein Files, Drawing Criticism for Heavy Redactions and Missed Deadline
The U.S. Department of Justice has begun releasing documents related to its investigations into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following a new federal transparency law. The release marks a long-awaited step toward public disclosure, but it has also triggered sharp criticism from lawmakers, victims’ advocates, and transparency groups due to extensive redactions and missing material. Under the recently enacted Epstein Files Transparency Act, the Justice Department was required to publish all unclassified records connected to Epstein within a set deadline. While officials released hundreds of thousands of pages, the department acknowledged it has not yet completed the full disclosure. Heavy Redactions Raise Concerns The documents include photos, court filings, flight logs, and investigative records. However, many pages are heavily redacted, with some entirely blacked out. Critics argue the level of redaction undermines the law’s intent and limits meaningful public accountability. Several released materials reference well-known public figures who had social or professional contact with Epstein in the past. Officials emphasized that the presence of names or images does not imply criminal wrongdoing, and no new charges were announced as part of the release. Justice Department officials stated that redactions were necessary to protect victims’ identities and comply with privacy laws. More than 1,000 victims are believed to be connected to Epstein’s crimes. Political and Public Backlash Lawmakers from both major parties expressed frustration, accusing the department of failing to meet both the spirit and the letter of the law. Some members of Congress are now considering legal action or additional oversight to compel fuller disclosure. Advocacy groups and survivors of Epstein’s abuse also voiced disappointment, arguing that partial transparency continues a long pattern of institutional secrecy surrounding Epstein’s network and enablers. What Comes Next The Justice Department says additional documents will be released in phases as review processes continue. Officials insist they remain committed to transparency while balancing legal and ethical obligations. As public scrutiny intensifies, the Epstein files release is expected to remain a major political and legal issue, renewing questions about accountability, power, and the protection of victims.
This news is for information only and is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making investment decisions.