Monday, 28 September 2026 IPO data updated 3 hours ago
Live GMP
A-One Steels India ₹405 ▲ +₹54 (13.3%) Moneyview ₹34 ▲ +₹14 (41.2%) Roopa Screen ₹64 ▲ +₹32 (50.0%) Bench Mark Infotech Services ₹110 ▲ +₹16 (14.6%) Acevector ₹32 ▲ +₹2 (6.3%) Orient Cables India ₹272 ▲ +₹85 (31.3%) German Green Steel Power ₹139 ▲ +₹27.5 (19.8%) Runwal Enterprises ₹305 ▲ +₹14.5 (4.8%) Dudani Retail ₹29 ▲ +₹3 (10.3%) Shah Investor's Home ₹167 ▲ +₹9 (5.4%) SRIT India ₹130 ▲ +₹32 (24.6%) Robokidz Eduventures ₹106 ▲ +₹80 (75.5%) FX Multitech ₹116 ▲ +₹6 (5.2%) ArMee Infotech ₹375 ▲ +₹8 (2.1%) Adroit Industries India ₹134 ▲ +₹53 (39.6%) Elevate Campuses ₹362 ▲ +₹4 (1.1%) Swastika Infra ₹185 ▲ +₹6 (3.2%) EverestIMS Technologies ₹85 ▲ +₹13 (15.3%) Vans Electroengineerings ₹118 ▲ +₹28 (23.7%) Green Asia Impex ₹90 GMP — Peshwa Wheat ₹101 GMP — Sai Urja Indo ₹113 GMP — Himalayan Solar ₹103 GMP — Shree TNB Polymers ₹52 GMP —

US bribery case: Adani makes first legal submission, asks court to defer ruling

US bribery case: Adani makes first legal submission, asks court to defer ruling

Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani have requested the US court to defer its ruling on the 21 January SEC motion, as their counsel and the US regulator were discussing a stipulation. Their lawyers made the first legal submission in the case 14 months after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a bribery and securities fraud complaint against the Indian billionaire and his nephew.

Global law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on behalf of Gautam Adani, with the consent of Sagar Adani, asked the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York to defer a ruling on a motion made by the SEC on 21 January, saying both parties were discussing a stipulation in the case. A stipulation is a formal agreement between opposing sides regarding a fact or procedure in the lawsuit that avoids repeated court debate.

Adani’s counsel did not specify the subject of the stipulation under discussion with the SEC. The SEC case was initially filed in November 2024 and alleges that the Adanis and others paid bribes to government officials in India to secure favourable power‑supply contracts for Adani Green Energy Ltd, and failed to disclose the payments to US investors while misstating company compliance practices.

The SEC is also seeking the court’s approval to serve summonses and the complaint directly by email and through US counsel, circumventing the usual requirement of personal service due to India’s Ministry of Law and Justice rejecting two previous requests to serve them in India. The SEC argues that public comments by Gautam Adani and legal representation taken on behalf of both defendants means they are already aware of the proceedings.

Related Context and Updates

• A separate report notes that the US Securities and Exchange Commission has asked a US court to bypass India’s government to serve legal summonses on Gautam and Sagar Adani, citing difficulties in conventional service methods and the defendants’ apparent awareness of the case.

• Another report states that Adani Group shares fell sharply, erasing roughly $12.5 billion in market value following the SEC’s move to seek the court’s permission to serve summonses directly via email.

This news is for information only and is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making investment decisions.