Monday, 28 September 2026 IPO data updated 3 hours ago
Live GMP
A-One Steels India ₹405 ▲ +₹54 (13.3%) Moneyview ₹34 ▲ +₹14 (41.2%) Roopa Screen ₹64 ▲ +₹32 (50.0%) Bench Mark Infotech Services ₹110 ▲ +₹16 (14.6%) Acevector ₹32 ▲ +₹2 (6.3%) Orient Cables India ₹272 ▲ +₹85 (31.3%) German Green Steel Power ₹139 ▲ +₹27.5 (19.8%) Runwal Enterprises ₹305 ▲ +₹14.5 (4.8%) Dudani Retail ₹29 ▲ +₹3 (10.3%) Shah Investor's Home ₹167 ▲ +₹9 (5.4%) SRIT India ₹130 ▲ +₹32 (24.6%) Robokidz Eduventures ₹106 ▲ +₹80 (75.5%) FX Multitech ₹116 ▲ +₹6 (5.2%) ArMee Infotech ₹375 ▲ +₹8 (2.1%) Adroit Industries India ₹134 ▲ +₹53 (39.6%) Elevate Campuses ₹362 ▲ +₹4 (1.1%) Swastika Infra ₹185 ▲ +₹6 (3.2%) EverestIMS Technologies ₹85 ▲ +₹13 (15.3%) Vans Electroengineerings ₹118 ▲ +₹28 (23.7%) Green Asia Impex ₹90 GMP — Peshwa Wheat ₹101 GMP — Sai Urja Indo ₹113 GMP — Himalayan Solar ₹103 GMP — Shree TNB Polymers ₹52 GMP —

Economic Survey Proposes Redefinition of ‘Government Company’

Economic Survey Proposes Redefinition of ‘Government Company’

The Economic Survey has proposed a review of the existing definition of a “government company,” highlighting the need to align it with contemporary ownership and control mechanisms. The recommendation comes amid changing structures of public sector enterprises, where government influence may extend beyond direct majority shareholding.

At present, a government company is defined largely on the basis of ownership, with the government holding at least 51 per cent of the paid-up share capital. However, the Economic Survey notes that this approach may not fully capture situations where the government exercises significant control through other means such as special rights, management control, or strategic influence.

The Survey argues that an updated definition would improve governance standards, ensure better accountability, and provide greater clarity in regulatory oversight. It also points out that an ownership-only framework may limit effective monitoring of entities where public interest remains significant despite lower government shareholding.

Experts believe that redefining government companies could have far-reaching implications for public sector undertakings (PSUs), including compliance requirements, audit norms, and policy decisions related to disinvestment and privatization. The move could also help policymakers better distinguish between purely private entities and those operating under substantial government control.

The recommendation is expected to be examined by policymakers and may form the basis for future legal and regulatory reforms aimed at strengthening public sector governance and transparency.

This news is for information only and is not investment advice. Please do your own research before making investment decisions.